Senate Majority Leader John Thune delivered Republicans a predictable defeat Thursday when competing healthcare bills failed 51-48, guaranteeing enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies expire December 31. Premiums double for 22 million Americans in January. The failure wasn’t Democrats blocking reform—it was Republicans refusing to lead.
Thune controlled the Senate with 53 seats and faced subsidies that 74 percent of Americans wanted extended. He had two options: eliminate the filibuster and pass a Republican alternative on party-line vote, or negotiate genuine compromise. He chose neither.
The Republican plan deposited $1,000 to $1,500 into health savings accounts for people buying bronze or catastrophic ACA plans. Those accounts can’t pay premiums—where costs spike—only deductibles averaging $7,500. Georgetown professor Sabrina Corlette called it “offering people a 1-foot rope to get out of a 10-foot hole.”
Four Republicans voted for the Democratic three-year extension: Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, and Josh Hawley. Rand Paul opposed the GOP plan. That 51-48 split proves Republicans could have passed their HSA proposal by eliminating the filibuster. They chose not to.
Thune’s post-vote response revealed the vacuum. When asked if subsidies would expire December 31, he answered: “I don’t know. I wouldn’t say that.” Then blamed Democrats: “The question is, are there enough Democrats who actually want to solve the problem to work the Republicans?”
Eight Senate Democrats broke ranks November 9 to reopen the government after a 40-day shutdown specifically to get this healthcare vote. Democrats delivered their side. Republicans delivered recriminations about “waste, fraud and abuse” while offering a plan that doesn’t address premium increases.
Premium increases hit January, five months before midterms. That 74 percent support isn’t enthusiasm for the ACA—it’s desperation from people trapped in a failing system watching Republicans fail to provide an alternative.
President Trump declared he’d only support sending money “directly to the people, not to the insurance companies,” but current ACA subsidies already go to people as tax credits. The HSA plan shifts where money goes—from premiums to deductibles—while letting premiums double. Trump couldn’t commit to the Cassidy-Crapo bill, saying only he liked the “concept.” He offered no plan.
Thune said Republicans want a “more durable” bipartisan solution getting 60 votes instead of using reconciliation or eliminating the filibuster. That’s avoiding responsibility. Bipartisan compromise requires both sides have leverage. Democrats have none except the calendar, which now works in their favor.
House Speaker Mike Johnson criticized discharge petitions from moderate Republicans trying to force subsidy votes, calling them “typically used as a tool against the majority.” That’s what happens when leadership won’t lead. Some House Republicans facing 2026 elections recognize offering “$80 a month” while premiums spike is political suicide.
Republicans spent 15 years attacking the ACA without developing replacement. In 2017, they controlled both chambers and the presidency and couldn’t agree on “repeal and replace.” Now they control one chamber by six seats and still can’t execute. Senator Tommy Tuberville warned Republicans “could be on the wrong side of public opinion” without showing they’re “trying to fix this.”
Americans trapped in healthcare they don’t want see costs double in January because Republicans refused to defend the current system or replace it. Democrats spend 2026 asking why Republicans let premiums spike rather than extend subsidies or eliminate the filibuster. Thune’s answer will be what it was Thursday: “I don’t know. I wouldn’t say that.” That’s not leadership. That guarantees Democrats keep this issue through November.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 