A four-day ski trip to Summit County runs $5,000 to $10,000 for a family. Epic Passes purchased months in advance. Non-refundable lodging. Flights. Gear rentals. When a family from Texas arrives at Keystone Resort and discovers only 16% of terrain is open, they face a brutal choice: lose thousands of dollars or ski anyway. Most ski anyway.
Four major incidents struck Keystone in 34 days this winter. Two dead. One paralyzed from the neck down. One 18-year-old with traumatic brain injury. All occurred during the worst snow conditions in 44 years, when Summit County snowpack hit the zeroth percentile, the lowest since measurements began in 1981. All four victims wore helmets. All were experienced. None collided with another person.
The resorts knew. Breckenridge posted explicit warnings that “the snowpack is still being built, which means obstacles such as trees, rocks, and other hazards may be present.” Only 11% of Vail Resorts’ Rocky Mountain terrain opened in December. Keystone offered 500 acres out of 3,150.
Limited terrain creates a deadly multiplier. When beginner runs close—they require the heaviest snowmaking—novice skiers migrate to intermediate blues they cannot handle. Advanced skiers crowd the same limited acreage. Traffic jams form at every lift line and trail intersection. Data from the 2024-25 season reveals the pattern: 10 of Colorado’s 13 ski deaths occurred on intermediate or beginner terrain, not expert runs. These are not daredevils pushing limits. They are traffic accidents.
The incentive structure points everyone toward catastrophe. Skiers face sunk costs they cannot recover. Resorts face pressure they cannot ignore—visits down 20%, stock down 52% from 2021 highs, CEO fired in May for missing earnings, guidance lowered again in January. Colorado law completes the trap. The Ski Safety Act declares that skiers assume “inherent risks” including ice, hard pack, bare spots, rocks, and stumps. The industry warned you. They are not liable.
Ski resorts operate in documented hazardous conditions, and when someone dies, they issue identical boilerplate: “Our hearts go out to the family.” Never: “Here is what conditions were. Here is what we are changing.”
Five years ago, Senate Bill 21-184 would have required resorts to report accidents including “the conditions at the time.” The bill died 4-1 in committee. The only “aye” came from Senator Jessie Danielson, the only member who had not accepted donations from Colorado Ski Country USA. The industry deployed 22 lobbyists to kill it.
The Colorado General Assembly opened January 14 and runs through May 13. No replacement bill has been introduced. No legislator has issued a statement on the Keystone deaths. Without transparency requirements, skiers see “variable conditions” but have no accident rates by running, no incident history, no way to assess actual risk.
Sandra Prokofi, 39, caught an edge on Upper Frenchman Trail on December 29 while snowboarding with her three sons. One child watched her fall. She is now paralyzed from the neck down, C2 through C4 vertebrae severed, breathing through a tracheostomy tube. A routine fall with catastrophic consequences.
William Hunnicutt, 32, died January 19 on Lower Go Devil after he “hit snow with force.” No collision. No trees. No objects. Just snow. What kind of snow? Nobody tracks that.
Under Colorado law, Vail Resorts bears no responsibility. The skiers assumed the risk. But someone decided those risks were worth taking skiers who could not afford to lose their investment, a corporation that could not afford to lose another revenue week, and a legislature that killed the only bill requiring anyone to explain the consequences.
Until that changes, math stays the same. Spend thousands. Hope for snow. Ski anyway.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 