Chaffee County Commissioner PT Wood called federal immigration enforcement “illegal incursions” and told constituents county officials are “actively looking at how we can react to those illegal incursions” during the county’s February 2nd meeting. Weeks earlier, county staff told property owners they “have to comply” with building regulations or face code enforcement.
The pattern held across Colorado’s mountain corridor sanctuary jurisdictions. Officials characterized lawful federal enforcement as “invading our communities” and “untethered executive power,” then demanded strict citizen compliance with local ordinances. Analysis of 32 government meeting transcripts from January 18 through February 6 documents the contradiction.
Chaffee County: “Illegal Incursions”
Chaffee County commissioners delivered the most explicit call for resistance during their February 2nd meeting, characterizing federal law enforcement as illegal activity requiring citizen action.
“ICE invading our communities, attacking our citizens, really acting well outside of the law,” Commissioner PT Wood stated. Wood told constituents Chaffee County officials are “actively looking at how we can react to those illegal incursions.”
Wood provided specific protest instructions: “As we protest, they need to remain peaceful. Break out your camera, record, observe, and witness.” Then delivered historical judgment: “History will not treat these people nicely, I can guarantee you that.”
Commissioner Dave Armstrong was more direct: “we must stand up and resist.” Armstrong added that “citizens of this country are being shot dead in the street is effing unacceptable.” Armstrong then expanded his criticism beyond immigration enforcement, claiming the president is “denying disaster aid to this state, freezing spending to this state, canceling clean drinking water projects.” He concluded: “We are in the upside down world, and we have to stand up to that.”
Commissioner Gina Lucrezi warned constituents: “if or when they come back to this county, please do not confuse” local law enforcement with ICE.
Wood and Armstrong characterized lawful federal immigration enforcement – conducted under Title 8 USC authority – as “illegal.” No citizen or fellow commissioner challenged these statements.
Weeks earlier, Chaffee County staff told property owners they “have to not have a reasonable building envelope outside the resource setback.” During the same February meeting where Wood and Armstrong urged resistance to federal law, officials discussed “exploring code enforcement” expansion.
Eagle County: “Untethered Power”
During their late January meeting, Eagle County commissioners warned that federal immigration enforcement represents “executive power in the United States right now that is untethered” and threatened the loss of “everything we have fought for for 250 years.”
Discussing the Minneapolis ICE incident, commissioners stated “this isn’t about immigration at all” while addressing immigration enforcement. The meeting included calls for constituents to “reach out to your congressional representatives” and specifically targeted “your Republican members of Congress who hold power of both houses.”
Commissioners affirmed they are “paying very very close attention” to federal immigration enforcement.
Eagle County tells property developers “you have to comply with our housing guidelines.” County staff pursued code enforcement on a barn structure built six years earlier because “there’s no agriculture on the parcel.” When buildings don’t meet square footage requirements: “Then you’re not in compliance.”
The county warned about “unchecked” federal power while enforcing regulations where citizens have no appeal and structures face retroactive enforcement years after construction.
Gunnison, Aspen, Breckenridge
During Gunnison County’s meeting, commissioners claimed ICE agents “aren’t upholding any of the standards or laws that law enforcement is required to uphold.” Commissioners expressed concern about “ICE taking pictures of protesters who are legally protesting, taking pictures of their faces, writing down their names and license plate numbers.”
The same officials who trust local sheriff and police with surveillance technology objected to federal use.
Gunnison County requires developers “you have to essentially pass three tests” for eligibility and “you need to replace it with a material that meets the code minimum.”
Aspen Mayor Rachael E. Richards characterized federal enforcement as “disturbing videos” showing “civil rights of individuals violated” and urged citizens to contact representatives.
At Breckenridge Town Council, a citizen stated fear that “if ice does come to our city” they would need to “unify and mobilize.” Council response: none documented.
The Pattern
Officials characterized federal immigration enforcement using military invasion terminology while demanding absolute citizen compliance with local regulations.
Federal law characterized as: “illegal incursions,” “invading our communities,” “attacking our citizens,” “untethered executive power,” “civil rights violations.”
Local law enforced with: “you have to comply,” “required to adopt,” “no option,” “Then you’re not in compliance.”
When elected officials characterize lawful federal enforcement as “illegal incursions” and urge citizens to “resist,” they encourage lawless behavior. Federal immigration enforcement operates under clear statutory authority (8 USC § 1227) and constitutional supremacy (Article I, Section 8).
These same immigration laws were enforced throughout the Obama administration. No transcripts document sanctuary jurisdiction officials characterizing that enforcement as “illegal incursions” or urging citizens to “resist.” The laws haven’t changed. The authority hasn’t changed. The administration changed.
Pagosa Springs demonstrates the enforcement side. Staff told council about mandatory state wildfire codes: “all communities in Colorado are required to adopt by April.” When asked if town had choice: “we don’t have an option.” Citizens replacing more than 25% of siding “have to bring the entire roof up to code.”
Sanctuary Status
Chaffee County, Eagle County, Gunnison County, Pitkin County, and Summit County maintain sanctuary policies providing covert support to illegal immigrants through limited cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
Federal law (8 USC § 1373) prohibits state and local governments from restricting information sharing with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Officials who refuse compliance with federal information-sharing requirements simultaneously enforce local building codes, housing regulations, and wildfire standards.
Article I, Section 8 grants Congress exclusive authority over immigration. The Supremacy Clause makes federal law supreme over state and local law. While states cannot be forced to enforce federal law, they cannot actively obstruct federal enforcement or violate federal information-sharing requirements.
Zero Challenges
Across 32 government meetings spanning three weeks, not one citizen or elected official challenged officials’ characterizations of federal immigration enforcement.
When officials called ICE operations “illegal incursions,” no one asked for legal basis. When they warned about “untethered executive power,” no one noted federal immigration authority comes from Congress. When they claimed ICE “aren’t upholding standards,” no one asked which standards.
In sanctuary jurisdictions, opposition to federal immigration enforcement goes unchallenged.
The Contradiction
When Chaffee County Commissioners PT Wood, Dave Armstrong, and Gina Lucrezi call federal enforcement “illegal incursions” requiring resistance, they encourage lawless behavior. When they tell property owners they “have to” comply with building setbacks or face code enforcement, they demand lawful behavior.
Federal immigration law: characterized as illegal, requiring resistance.
Local building codes: characterized as mandatory, requiring compliance.
Same officials. Same meetings. Zero challenges.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 