Internal DHS data on ICE arrests since President Trump’s second inauguration (roughly 393,000 total arrests in the first full year) shows that about 0.3% were flagged as Tren de Aragua (TdA) members, around 1,200 individuals in that enforcement wave. Overall, approximately 1.9% (~7,500) were identified as gang members. DHS separately announced that ICE arrested about 7,000 gang members nationwide during this period.
These figures may sound small in percentage terms, but to the parent whose daughter was raped, the shop owner extorted for years, or the family who buried a loved one murdered by a gang member, touting “only 0.3%” feels obscene. It trivializes real suffering and implies that concern over these cases is unreasonable. Small percentages, when applied to large populations(10,000,000-14,000,000 illegal immigrants in the US) and multiplied by high-offense individuals, produce devastating consequences.
Gang members like those in TdA concentrate violence: one cell can terrorize an apartment complex for months; one repeat offender can victimize dozens or hundreds. These are organized criminals involved in human trafficking, extortion, murder, and preying heavily on immigrant communities themselves.
We are often told that undocumented immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than native-born Americans. Studies, particularly Texas data (the only state that systematically tracks arrests and convictions by immigration status), support lower per-capita rates for undocumented immigrants in many categories.
However, these findings come with important caveats that are rarely highlighted:
- They reflect only U.S. crimes, ignoring prior offenses in home countries like Venezuela, where records are often unreliable due to corruption and non-cooperation.
- Many serious crimes are not categorized to be included in the data.
- Underreporting is widespread in immigrant communities, where victims fear deportation more than the perpetrators (often other immigrants).
- Most other states lack comparable data due to sanctuary policies or limited cooperation with federal officials, creating significant gaps in national transparency.
A small number of prolific offenders can generate thousands of victims while the overall demographic group appears “low crime” statistically. Organized groups like TdA exploit this: they don’t need to be a large share of the population to destroy neighborhoods, control buildings, or turn shelters into trafficking hubs.
Yet focusing on these realities is often labeled bigotry. Protests frequently block ICE operations without distinguishing between law-abiding immigrants and those wanted for serious crimes. This rhetoric effectively shields even violent offenders, despite polls showing overwhelming public support (70–80%+) for deporting criminal noncitizens, a consensus that crosses party lines.
Governments routinely collect detailed demographic data on race, gender, and ethnicity for policy purposes, but immigration status often goes untracked or underreported. Many government officials simply do not want to know. Texas demonstrates what full transparency looks like; the rest of the country’s reluctance appears less about privacy and more about avoiding inconvenient facts.
Small percentages like 0.3% make for opportune headlines supporting political spin, but they offer no comfort to grieving families. Data gaps, selective statistics, and blanket resistance to enforcement send a clear message: your safety is at best secondary priority, sacrificed at the altar of someone else’s ideology.
Americans aren’t demanding perfection. They’re demanding honesty: remove identified gang members and violent offenders, secure the border to prevent recurrence, and stop shielding predators behind protests, sanctuary rules, or statistical minimization. The victims making up those “small percentages” all have a human face. Their pain is very real.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 