Cargill Meat Solutions locked out approximately 1,700 workers at its Fort Morgan beef plant on May 20, 2026, after 88 percent of the workforce voted against the company’s latest contract offer. The plant, which processes thousands of cattle daily and sits at the center of Morgan County’s economy, has been idle since April 23. What national media has not explained is how that workforce got there — and who benefited most from the arrangement.
The answer runs through Washington, D.C., not Mogadishu.
After a large-scale federal immigration raid gutted Swift & Company’s Greeley meatpacking plant in December 2006, Swift and other industry players faced a hard problem: they needed thousands of workers willing to do some of the most dangerous manual labor in America, in rural towns far from major cities, for wages no longer competitive with urban markets. The solution was not to raise pay. It was to redirect the federal refugee resettlement system.
The industry’s answer was the federal refugee resettlement system. Ryan Gray, program director at Lutheran Family Services Rocky Mountains in Greeley, told Bloomberg in 2017 that of the nearly 450 individuals his office resettled in a single year, approximately 40 percent went directly to either the Cargill plant in Fort Morgan or the rival JBS facility in Greeley. A federally funded nonprofit was functioning, in practice, as a staffing pipeline for two of the largest beef processors in the country. Gray made the statement on record while explaining how Trump’s 2017 refugee ban threatened Cargill’s labor supply — confirming that the pipeline was deliberate, acknowledged, and considered essential to the plant’s operation.
The workers who came were legal. Somali refugees in Fort Morgan arrived under federal resettlement authorization — they had documents, work permits, and in many cases had been waiting years for family members to join them. By 2018, approximately 1,200 Somali residents lived in Fort Morgan, nearly eight percent of the town’s population of 15,000, with hundreds employed at Cargill. They were not smuggled in. They were recruited in, with federal assistance, because the labor was cheap and turnover absorbed without friction.
Fort Morgan absorbed the demographic transformation without being asked whether it wanted to. Longtime residents described the change in a 2017 KUNC report as feeling less like transparent integration and more like a covert shift — hundreds of new residents, a new religion, a new language, arriving within the span of a few years in a conservative agricultural town with no mosque, no Arabic-speaking services, and limited infrastructure to support rapid cultural change. Local residents were not hostile to the workers as individuals. They were, reasonably, bewildered by a process that consulted no one in Morgan County before redirecting a federal program toward a private corporation’s labor shortage.
The corporation, meanwhile, was not acting in good faith toward the workers it recruited. In December 2015, Cargill supervisors told Somali employees at Fort Morgan they would no longer be allowed to take prayer breaks — a condition that had been part of their employment arrangement. About 150 workers walked off the line. Cargill fired them for attendance violations. The Colorado Department of Labor investigated and sided with the workers, finding them not at fault for the policy change. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission subsequently found reasonable cause that Somali, African, and Muslim employees had been harassed and denied accommodation. Cargill settled for $1.5 million to 138 workers without admitting wrongdoing.
The union representing those workers, Teamsters Local 455, was not a reliable advocate. The EEOC found the union had also failed to fairly represent the Muslim employees and required it to pay $153,000 to resolve the discrimination claims. That same union — Teamsters Local 455 — is now leading the workforce locked out by Cargill in the current contract dispute.
The lockout covers nearly 20 percent of Fort Morgan’s population, according to the Teamsters. Cargill says its contract offer represents a $33.4 million investment over five years. Workers — described by their own union as coming from Haiti, Somalia, and Central and South America — voted against it 1,388 to 252. The plant has not harvested since April 23.
What connects 2006 to 2026 is not a story about refugees. It is a story about a corporation that used federal policy to construct a captive workforce in a town that had no vote in the matter, extracted years of labor from workers who had limited alternatives, violated their religious accommodations when inconvenient, fought their union representation, and is now locking them out when they vote against a contract the company wrote.
The federal government funded the resettlement. The resettlement agencies provided the workers. Cargill provided the jobs — on its terms, until those terms became inconvenient. Morgan County, Fort Morgan, and the workers themselves absorbed every consequence of an arrangement made in corporate offices and federal agencies far from the eastern plains.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 