Colorado ratepayers in nine counties will spend 100 years repaying $455 million for a water pipeline that serves six counties. The final payment comes due in 2135—at least 25 years after the pipes need replacement. By then, your great-grandchildren will be paying for infrastructure that died before they were born while simultaneously funding its replacement.
On December 16, Senators Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper applauded Senate passage of the “Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act.” The House passed the legislation in July with support from Representatives Jeff Hurd and Lauren Boebert. The bill now goes to President Trump for signature. All four praised zero percent interest on a 100-year loan to build a 130-mile pipeline from Pueblo Reservoir to 39 southeastern Colorado communities. None are concerned with the intergenerational trap.
The Arkansas Valley Conduit will cost $1.3 billion to build. The federal government writes the entire check upfront, then expects local communities to repay 35 percent—$455 million—over a century. The new law eliminates interest and doubles the repayment period from 50 to 100 years, cutting annual payments from roughly $18 million to $4.5 million.
Those payments come from property taxes across the entire Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District’s nine counties. Only six receive pipeline water: Pueblo, Crowley, Otero, Bent, Kiowa, and Prowers. The other three counties—Chaffee, Fremont, and El Paso—pay property taxes for water they never receive.
The pipeline uses 30-inch diameter HDPE pipe tapering to 16 inches by Lamar. Industry standard lifespan for high-density polyethylene pipe ranges from 50 to 100 years. The Bureau of Reclamation estimates 75 years. Repayment extends to 2135. Pipeline replacement becomes necessary between 2100 and 2125—while debt payments continue for another 10 to 35 years.
No funding mechanism exists for replacement. No plan addresses who pays when pipes fail before debt is repaid. The December 16 law addresses only interest rates and payment terms, not infrastructure lifespan or replacement costs.
Construction began in 2023. Optimistic completion: 2028. Realistic completion: 2035—a 12-year timeline. The $1.3 billion divided by 130 miles of main trunk line equals $10 million per mile. Add 100 miles of spur lines to individual communities and the system totals 230 miles at $5.65 million per mile.
Industry standards for large-diameter water pipelines in flat terrain run $2 to $4 million per mile. The Arkansas Valley Conduit follows State Highway 50 through relatively flat country. A 12-year construction timeline doubles costs through inflation—money spent on bureaucracy rather than pipe in the ground.
The Bureau of Reclamation completed a Final Environmental Impact Statement in August 2013. It analyzed seven alternatives: six different pipeline routes plus “No Action.” No Action meant continuing with contaminated water—not evaluating distributed treatment alternatives. The question was never “Should we build this pipeline?” but rather “Which route should we use?”
Two communities already solved the problem. Las Animas and La Junta built reverse osmosis plants. The water is safe. Bill Long, president of the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, confirmed to Colorado Public Radio: “In Las Animas, we built a reverse osmosis plant. Now our drinking water is perfect, but we have a problem with the reject water from the RO plant. We can discharge that back to the river, but we can’t do that in perpetuity.”
The stated problem with reverse osmosis isn’t cost or effectiveness—it’s that Colorado won’t issue permanent discharge permits for contaminated wastewater. The pipeline solves a regulatory problem, not an engineering problem.
A distributed treatment alternative costs roughly $117 million in capital for 39 community reverse osmosis systems at $3 million each. Operating costs run approximately $200,000 per community annually—$780 million over 100 years. Total: $900 million over a century.
The pipeline costs $1.3 billion for construction, $455 million in local repayment, $75 million for spur lines, plus individual connection costs. Wiley—population 400—expects to spend $5.1 million just for pipes and pumps to connect. Total system cost exceeds $1.5 billion before other communities pay their connection fees.
The Bureau of Reclamation’s website states alternatives “consist of expensive options such as reverse-osmosis, ion exchange, filtration, and bottled water.” No cost comparison appears in public documents. The 2016 Senate Report claims the pipeline provides water “via a least-cost regional system” without showing the math.
Federal law in 1962 authorized the conduit as part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project signed by President Kennedy. It was never built because local communities couldn’t afford 100 percent of costs. The 2009 law changed cost-sharing to 65 percent federal, 35 percent local. The promise was made 63 years before construction began in 2023.
Seventeen of the 39 communities live under state enforcement orders for water quality violations. Some orders date back decades. The state allows them to continue delivering contaminated water while waiting for the pipeline. Naturally occurring radium levels run 63 times higher than Pueblo Reservoir water. Uranium levels exceed federal limits.
People in these communities bought water from vending machines for years. Residents drink bottled water or install expensive home filtration systems. The need for clean water is real. The urgency is documented.
The question isn’t whether southeastern Colorado deserves clean water. The question is whether a $1.3 billion pipeline taking 12 years to build and requiring 100 years to repay represents the most responsible use of public funds when distributed treatment alternatives cost 40 percent less and could be operational within three years.
Colorado’s congressional delegation celebrated eliminating interest on a century-long debt that burdens counties receiving no water while the actual beneficiaries watch infrastructure age toward failure. The federal government authorized this project in 1962, then waited 61 years while rural communities drank contaminated water because they couldn’t afford 100 percent of construction costs.
Now those same communities will repay the federal loan until 2135 while replacing pipes that failed decades earlier. When pressed on alternatives, officials cite regulatory barriers to permanent wastewater discharge permits—barriers the state controls. Colorado created the regulatory environment that makes reverse osmosis ‘impractical,’ then used that regulatory barrier to justify a federal loan requiring four generations to repay.
The Arkansas Valley Conduit isn’t infrastructure investment. It’s intergenerational debt servicing a federal promise made when Kennedy was president, delayed until communities had no choice, then structured so grandchildren unborn today will pay for pipes that died before they inherited the bill.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 