The Department of Justice sued Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold on December 11 to compel release of voter registration records including driver’s license numbers and Social Security numbers. Griswold announced the lawsuit in a press release before DOJ published the complaint, framing federal inspection authority as Trump seeking to “undermine our elections” while the actual legal arguments remained unavailable for public review.
DOJ demands data the federal government already controls through other systems. Social Security numbers are issued by the Social Security Administration. Colorado driver’s licenses comply with the federal Real ID Act, meeting Department of Homeland Security standards. Griswold characterizes this federal data as “sensitive voting information” she must protect from federal inspection.
The complaint cites three federal statutes: the Civil Rights Act of 1960, the National Voter Registration Act, and the Help America Vote Act. Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer, a Bush appointee who previously handled Judicial Watch’s 2020 lawsuit against Griswold over voter roll maintenance, drew the case. That case settled after Griswold agreed to provide annual data on discontinued registrations, though Brimmer later refused to reopen it when discrepancies emerged between Griswold’s discovery responses and post-settlement reports.
A factual dispute exists that cannot be verified without the complaint. Griswold’s press release states Colorado “shared publicly-available data consistent with applicable law” in response to DOJ’s May 12 request. News reports citing the complaint state DOJ alleges Colorado “did not respond” to that letter.
DOJ attorney Eric Neff emailed Griswold on December 1 requesting Colorado’s voter registration list. Neff recently joined DOJ after briefly representing election conspiracy theorist Patrick Byrne, working under Stefanie Lambert, who faces felony charges for allegedly accessing Michigan voting tabulators. As a local prosecutor, Neff brought charges based on election denial group True the Vote’s tips; the charges were dismissed and the county paid $5 million to settle the resulting lawsuit.
Griswold responded December 3: “We will not be producing unredacted voter files or signing the MOU.” Her “DOJ can take a hike” press release followed the same day. The lawsuit arrived December 11, hours before Trump announced a symbolic pardon for Tina Peters, the Mesa County clerk Griswold prosecuted for election security breaches.
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser will defend Griswold while running for governor in 2026. Griswold is running for attorney general with a campaign message of being “one of the first lines of defense against the Trump administration.” Her campaign sent fundraising texts using language identical to her lawsuit press release, the Denver Post reported. She raised record-breaking amounts in her first 24 hours as a candidate and second quarter.
The lawsuit serves Griswold’s political interests regardless of legal outcome. Fighting Trump in federal court positions her as defender of voter privacy while testing whether DOJ has statutory authority for these demands. Victory establishes precedent limiting federal inspection powers. Defeat still provides the resistance narrative her Democratic primary campaign requires.
Griswold co-signed a November 18 letter with nine other Democratic secretaries of state questioning whether DOJ and DHS had misled officials about data sharing. Neither agency responded. DHS told state officials in September it had not received voter data from DOJ; the Trump administration issued a statement the next day saying DOJ was sharing data with DHS.
DOJ has sued 18 states—all voted Democratic in recent presidential elections. Of 40 states receiving requests, only Indiana and Wyoming fully complied. The 17 other lawsuits remain pending with no court rulings. DOJ requests voter lists within five days of any court order.
DOJ extends Civil Rights Act provisions enacted to combat Jim Crow voter suppression to authorize comprehensive data collection from all registered voters. State officials counter that anti-discrimination enforcement authority does not include building federal voter databases. But the federal government already maintains the underlying identification systems through Social Security and Real ID compliance.
DOJ announced prison investigations December 8, examining Colorado Department of Corrections and Youth Services facilities amid Trump’s demands that Colorado release Peters. Federal scrutiny of state prisons combined with the voter data lawsuit creates concurrent pressure on state sovereignty claims.
Judge Brimmer will rule whether Civil Rights-era statutes grant executive branch officials inspection authority over voter records, or whether states can restrict disclosure of federally-issued identification numbers through privacy laws. Until the complaint becomes public, Colorado voters evaluate the dispute through Griswold’s characterization alone—the same transparency standard she demands from federal officials she now refuses to provide about litigation against her office.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent.
