This is a simplified primer on the Chaffee County Land Use Code (LUC) changes, intended to inform the general public about the EDC’s role and the outcomes.
Chaffee County updated its main rules for building and land use, called the Land Use Code (LUC). The first draft was made public September 30, 2024. The County Commissioners approved it on November 19, 2024. It went into effect January 1, 2025. This was a rushed process for a dense 377-page document with such far-reaching implications.
Before the vote, the Chaffee County Economic Development Corporation (EDC), a group made up of local business owners and leaders, sent a strong warning letter on November 4, 2024, to the county planning director (see EDC’s policy statement. They said the new rules focused too heavily on protecting open land and nature by forcing bigger lots and fewer homes per area.
Their main worry: Homes would end up spread far apart (“one porch light every 35 acres”) instead of grouped near towns, roads, and utilities. This could make housing more expensive, hurt job growth and the economy, and lower property values, all without first studying the economic damage.The EDC asked the county to balance their goals with more affordable homes and business-friendly rules, just like the county’s own 2020 comprehensive plan says.
Main Complaints in the EDC Letter
- No study on how the rules would affect housing prices, taxes, or jobs.
- 35-acre minimum lot sizes seemed too big and wasteful, they wanted proof it made sense.
- Not enough room for building near towns like Buena Vista, Salida, and Poncha Springs.
- Too few homes allowed in rural and farm areas (one every 5 to 8.75 acres), which pushes only expensive big homes.
- Almost no building allowed on some private land marked “public/conservation/recreation” (PCR zone), they said this was unfair and could cause lawsuits.
- Water rules too complicated and expensive for small projects.
- Special event limits got stricter again after being relaxed earlier.
- Problems for big local businesses like Mount Princeton Resort, they asked for a special “resort” zoning category.
- They also wanted an easy way to fix mistakes after approval and regular check-ins with businesses.
What Actually Changed?
The final rules stayed very close to the original draft. The commissioners put more weight on saving open space and stopping sprawl than on making things easier for building and growth. A few small changes happened in the final version (late 2024):
- Removed limits on big special events (over 2,000 people).
- Allowed single-family homes (with a simple permit) on private land in the old PCR zone, a small step to ease the total ban.
- Made a tiny change to “density bonuses” (extra homes if you save open space) and clarified some wildlife and ditch rules.
- In the 2025 “glitch fixes” (approved September 16, 2025): These were just to correct errors, not big policy shifts.
- Renamed some zones and added a wildlife zone for public land only.
- Fixed map mistakes, appeal notices, building size limits, and affordable housing wording.
- Removed one rule that forced new lots to be only for homes (a little more flexibility).
What did NOT change (the big EDC worries ignored):
- No economic study was done before approval.
- Home limits in rural areas stayed low, no shift to allow more near roads or services.
- Zoning near towns wasn’t made much easier for building.
- No special “resort” zone was created for places like Mount Princeton.
- Water rules and other technical hurdles mostly stayed the same.
- In 2025 hearings, many landowners said these fixes were too small and didn’t solve the real problems, too much red tape and too few building options.
The EDC’s letter was a clear call for better balance between competing priorities. The final rules closely followed the original draft. There are still small reviews happening in 2026, so more tweaks could come. But local taxpayers and businesses need to keep asking: Was the revised LUC the best path forward for the residents of Chaffee County?
Listing of EDC Board Members in 2024-What is wrong with this picture?
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 