Vince Phillips
The Oak Street (Highway 291) improvements project was sold to Salida residents as a major win for our community. Completed for $4.4M in late 2025 after years of construction, it promised safer streets, better pedestrian access, bike lanes, new curbs and gutters, and upgraded stormwater systems to tackle long-standing runoff issues. Months later, the reality on the ground tells a different story. Persistent drainage failures continue to plague the corridor, creating health hazards, property damage, and frustration for residents.
First, stagnant water pools in roadside ditches after rain or snowmelt, as captured in the attached photo showing murky, standing water leading into a shaded culvert. These low-flow, debris-filled spots are perfect breeding grounds for mosquitoes like Culex tarsalis and Aedes vexans, which thrive in standing water and mature in just 7–14 days. Shaded culverts shield larvae from UV light and keep water cooler, boosting survival rates. Continuously wet spaces under Oak St are a mosquito’s dream. In Colorado, where West Nile virus outbreaks have caused serious illness and deaths in recent years, this is no minor inconvenience, it’s a preventable public health risk. Pets also face heartworm threats from mosquitoes. City officials have acknowledged the issue and mentioned plans to fix it, but without a firm timeline, residents are left waiting as spring melt and summer rains approach. Why aren’t we mitigating this unnecessary risk?
In 2023 alone, Colorado recorded 50 deaths from West Nile virus, nearly a quarter of the nationwide total of 208—making it one of the hardest-hit states that year. With stagnant water pooling in the middle of a residential neighborhood right here in Salida, these concerns are grounded in reality, not speculation. Mosquitoes can fly considerable distances from breeding sites, meaning most of Salida could be impacted if we allow these conditions to persist.
Beyond the human toll from West Nile virus, our pets face a stealthy threat from mosquito-borne heartworm disease, transmitted by species like Aedes vexans breeding in Salida’s stagnant roadside water. Heartworm often lurks undetected for months, with early symptoms such as mild coughing or fatigue easily dismissed as normal aging or minor ailments, allowing the parasites to silently damage the heart and lungs before owners seek help. By then, treatment may be too late or ineffective. If left untreated, the disease proves fatal in 80-90% of cases, but early detection and intervention boast a 95% or higher survival rate through medications and supportive care. In a high-altitude community like Salida, where mosquitoes can proliferate from unchecked pooling in residential areas, the wisest and most effective course is eliminating the stagnant water sources themselves, through proper drainage fixes, rather than relying on treating individual pets.
Second, a decades-old problem was not corrected. Stormwater flows under Oak Street through culverts and then discharges directly onto private front yards and streets before flowing downhill to the Arkansas River. Attached photos show one inlet near a sidewalk and gravel area, and the outlet cascading under rocks into a yard, causing erosion, flooding, and winter ice hazards. The Oak Street project was the perfect opportunity to install proper channels to direct water safely. Instead, budget constraints were cited as the reason for leaving it unchanged.
This raises a troubling question of fairness. If a private developer or homeowner redirected runoff in a way that harmed neighbors, Colorado law, rooted in the reasonable use doctrine, would likely hold them accountable. Alterations to natural drainage must be reasonable and not unreasonably increase harm downstream. Salida’s own Design Criteria Manual and stormwater ordinances (Chapter 16, Article VIII) require proper conveyance and erosion control to avoid burdening adjacent properties. As a regulated small MS4(Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) under Colorado’s stormwater program (tied to federal Clean Water Act standards), the city must manage runoff to reduce pollutants and hazards.
By tolerating standing water and unmanaged discharges that it would never allow from private parties, the city applies a double standard. It seems odd that new developments must follow stringent rules, while older areas, even those directly adjacent to upgraded infrastructure, are left with dramatically substandard drainage.
Speculations on why the city might believe these rules don’t fully apply could include: (1) interpreting the standards as limited to “new developments” like private subdivisions, not public upgrades; (2) considering pre-existing culverts as “grandfathered” under nonconforming use provisions, allowing legacy issues to persist; and (3) practical budget constraints prioritizing core improvements over full retrofits.
In principle, a massive upgrade like the Oak Street project could have triggered mandates to bring adjacent areas up to code. Colorado stormwater regulations require construction disturbing over one acre (which this project likely did) to obtain permits ensuring erosion control and proper conveyance. Substantial alterations to nonconforming structures typically require compliance with the current standard.
The Oak Street project delivered smoother pavement and bike lanes, but it failed to deliver on comprehensive stormwater fixes.
I call on Salida City Officials to:
- Prioritize drainage retrofits to protect private properties.
- Commit publicly to a specific timeline for eliminating stagnant water pools via improved drainage.
- Engage residents transparently on funding and next steps.
Addressing health threats is exactly what we expect from our government. Let’s put the well-being of Salida’s citizens and their four-legged companions first and take strong measures to banish the mosquitoes that endanger us all.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 