The Department of Justice is recruiting immigration judges under a marketing campaign that calls them exactly what they are: deportation judges. The campaign offers salaries up to $207,500, 25% signing bonuses for first-time federal employees in high-cost cities, and positions at 70 locations nationwide including Denver.
Unlike federal judges with lifetime appointments, immigration judges are DOJ employees working within the Executive Office for Immigration Review. They’ve always been part of the executive branch’s enforcement apparatus. The Justice Department is simply being more honest about it.
The federal government isn’t looking for novices. The position requires a law degree, active bar membership, U.S. citizenship, and seven years of post-bar legal experience. Applicants must demonstrate capability in three of five areas: knowledge of immigration law, substantial litigation experience, handling complex legal issues, conducting administrative hearings, or knowledge of judicial practices. According to the official USAJobs posting (announcement DE-12833521-26-TNN), qualifying experience is calculated only after bar admission, and applicants must document specific employment details including dates, employers, duties performed, and grade levels for any federal service.
The hiring process involves panel evaluation by senior EOIR employees, structured interviews, reference checks covering ten years of supervisors, and full background investigations before final appointment by the Attorney General. Applications are reviewed on rolling cut-off dates through April 9, 2026.
EOIR operates under a statutory cap of 800 permanent immigration judges established by Federal Register notice on August 28, 2025. The system currently has approximately 600 judges after more than 140 departed this year through terminations, voluntary separations, or retirements. That leaves roughly 200 positions to fill against a backlog of 3.75 million pending cases. EOIR reports judges have reduced this backlog by more than 440,000 cases since January 2025, the sharpest decline in the system’s history.
The controversial part isn’t the hiring campaign. It’s that the federal government is simultaneously clearing out judges whose decisions don’t align with current enforcement priorities. But this addresses what immigration attorneys have called “justice by ZIP code” — the same legal claims producing wildly different outcomes depending on which judge hears the case. New York immigration courts grant asylum in 55-60% of cases. Some jurisdictions grant under 15%. Individual judges grant under 5%. Same statutes, same regulations, completely different results based solely on who sits on the bench.
The Justice Department is standardizing this. Immigration judges operate under Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the Immigration and Nationality Act. There’s one set of laws. Getting judges to apply them consistently isn’t controversial — it’s how courts are supposed to work.
Colorado has immigration courts in Denver and Aurora, subject to the same backlog and judge-dependent outcomes. The state’s rural counties see residents caught in removal proceedings waiting years for resolution while living in legal limbo. The addition of 200 judges nationwide, combined with authorization of up to 600 temporary military lawyers serving as immigration judges, represents the largest expansion of immigration court capacity in the system’s history.
Any attorney with seven years of post-bar experience can apply through USAJobs.gov. The position offers full federal benefits, potential for remote work, and placement in one of 70 locations based on applicant preference. The recruitment incentive of 25% applies to first-time federal employees placed in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston, Sacramento, and several other major cities. Denver and Aurora are not currently listed among bonus locations.
What the mainstream coverage misses is the structural question the campaign exposes: whether immigration courts belong inside the Department of Justice at all. The executive branch handles enforcement through ICE and Border Patrol. Having the judges who rule on those enforcement actions also work for DOJ creates an inherent conflict — one that’s existed for decades but becomes impossible to ignore when the department explicitly markets positions as “deportation judges.” The system was already broken. The current administration is just making the brokenness visible while using it to clear the backlog faster. For Colorado residents in removal proceedings, that means quicker resolution under judges who will apply the law consistently — which is either a feature or a bug depending on whether you think the previous system’s inconsistency was judicial independence or judicial chaos.
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 