President Trump’s proposal to redirect Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies from insurance companies directly to individuals deserves more attention than it’s getting. Forget the politics for a moment — just follow the money.
The federal government spends roughly $26 billion each year on ACA premium subsidies. Since the ACA passed, insurance company stock values have jumped more than 1,000 percent, compared with 251 percent for the S&P 500. That says plenty about who’s really benefited from “affordable” care.
Take a middle-class family earning $75,000. ACA subsidies reduce their premiums by about $3,300, but that money goes straight to the insurance company. The family never sees a dime. They build no equity, no savings, and gain no control. Extending those subsidies another decade would cost taxpayers $350 billion — mostly corporate welfare disguised as healthcare.
Fraud compounds the waste. Federal audits estimate 6.4 million improper enrollments in marketplace plans next year alone — a $27 billion hit. More than one-third of enrollees filed zero claims, yet insurers still collected full federal payments. Under a direct-payment model, verification happens upfront. No claim, no payout.
Direct payments also restore freedom. Why can you add anyone to your car insurance, but not your adult child or aging parent to your health plan? Insurance companies define “family” for you, then collect your tax dollars. Under a direct system, you could use your benefit to help whoever in your family needs care.
We already have the framework: Health Savings Accounts. HSAs are portable, tax-advantaged, and proven to encourage smart spending. Redirecting subsidies into individual HSAs would shift power from corporate offices to kitchen tables.
Critics say people can’t handle their own healthcare funds. The data say otherwise. HSA users save money, compare prices, and maintain balances year after year. When patients control spending, providers compete on cost and value — not insurance contracts.
The question before Congress is simple: keep pouring billions into insurance profits, or put that money in the hands of Americans who actually need care. The current subsidies expire December 31, 2025. Expect heavy lobbying from the industry that’s thrived under the status quo.
Trump’s idea doesn’t raise taxes or add new programs. It reroutes existing dollars — from bureaucrats and shareholders to citizens. In a town obsessed with spending more, that alone should earn it a serious hearing.
Jerry White
Support Independent Local Journalism — High Country Advocate was created as a real alternative to regional media that too often silences dissenting voices while taking sides in the political struggle. Producing in-depth, unflinching reporting like this series and others is expensive: servers, editing, research time, and legal review all add up quickly. If these articles have informed you or given you new perspective, please consider supporting HCA with a paid subscription — every subscriber helps keep this reporting strong and independent. 